Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan DEI SEL topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Somerset board debates DEI and social-emotional learning language in strategic plan; no policy change
Summary
Board members asked administrators for clearer details on what programs, funding and action steps exist for strategic-plan goals on diversity/equity/inclusion and social-emotional learning; a motion to remove 'diversity, equity and inclusion' from the plan failed for lack of a second.
Somerset School Board members spent a substantial portion of the meeting debating language in the district's strategic plan that references diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (goal 1.4) and social-emotional learning, character development and mental health (goal 1.3). No formal policy change was adopted.
Board members expressed differing views about the wording. Some said they want the district to remain competitive and to ensure every student has equitable opportunity; others said the specific DEI language has become controversial and asked administrators to clarify what programs, training, curricular materials and funding are tied to those strategic-plan goals.
Several board members asked administrators to return with concrete "action steps" for each building and documentation of any programs or funding that exist specifically because of the goals. One board member estimated an audit to inventory relevant policies, curriculum and training would require about 200 hours; others said administrators and vendors such as Neola could help with policy reviews and compliance.
A board member offered a motion to replace the goal language "promote a culture of diversity, Equity inclusion and belonging for all students" with "promote a culture of belonging for all students." The chair noted the item was listed on the agenda for discussion; the motion received no second and therefore died. Board members agreed to have administrators prepare information for a future work session, including the programs tied to those goals, any related funding, and action steps at the school level.
Discussion also covered social-emotional learning (SEL). Board members asked which SEL curricula the district uses (references were made to frameworks such as CASEL) and requested details on counselors, mental-health staff numbers and any programs implemented specifically because of the plan.
No formal amendments or policy adoptions were made; the board deferred further action pending administrator reports at a future meeting.
