Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays vote on proposed norms, debates Robert's Rules and member expectations
Summary
Trustees debated a proposed set of board norms at length Sept. 9, with some members calling the draft too prescriptive and others urging adoption; the item will stay on the agenda for further revision and a possible vote at the next meeting.
The Green Bay Area Public School District Board of Education spent substantial time Sept. 9 reviewing proposed board norms drafted after a recent retreat, but did not adopt them.
Some trustees said the draft is overly prescriptive. Trustee Andrew said he found provisions too detailed and suggested they remove items that read as constraints on elected officials; he said he was "probably just going to vote no" but that he would generally follow the norms. Trustee Bryan and others agreed that phrasing such as "members will" feels directive and suggested simpler, principle-based language.
Other trustees defended having a clear, explicit set of norms to foster consistent decorum. Trustees discussed whether the proposed norms duplicate procedural expectations already covered by Robert's Rules of Order and whether the board should instead craft a simplified local rules-of-order summary culled from Robert's Rules for small boards.
Chair Laura and staff said the item would remain on upcoming agendas for redrafting and a future formal vote; trustees asked for additional wordsmithing and for comparison side-by-side with Robert's Rules to identify redundancies.
Trustee James then moved to adjourn, Trustee Rick seconded, and the board called the motion by voice. The chair declared the meeting adjourned after an "Aye" from those present.
