Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Assets topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmaker on Senate floor says politics, not policy, blocked passage of the 'Genius Act'
Summary
On the Senate floor a lawmaker criticized colleagues for reversing earlier committee support and blocking the Genius Act, calling the decision political and pledging to keep working on U.S. rules for digital assets. The speech cited extensive bipartisan committee work and urged clarity for entrepreneurs.
A lawmaker on the Senate floor criticized a Senate vote that blocked the Genius Act, saying colleagues abandoned a bipartisan, committee-crafted bill for political reasons and pledging to continue work on U.S. digital-asset rules.
The lawmaker said the bill would have "made our markets safer and cheaper for everyday working Americans," arguing it would lower costs for single parents and blue-collar households and "democratize" the financial system. "What changed, Mr. President? Not the substance," the lawmaker said, blaming politics for the outcome.
The speaker told the chamber the Genius Act was developed in the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and described lengthy bipartisan negotiations: "We offered almost 80 amendments during this session at the banking committee. We voted on 40 amendments in the banking committee." The lawmaker said staff from both parties spent "thousands of hours" refining the bill.
The lawmaker also condemned floor voting behavior, saying some Democratic colleagues who had backed committee work "took a step back and vote[d] against the very bill they voted for the bill they shaped." The speaker characterized the floor vote as motivated by opposition to President Trump’s agenda: "It was a vote against President Trump and President Trump's legislative agenda."
On policy substance, the lawmaker said the Genius Act included measures to advance safety, consumer protections and anti-money-laundering compliance, invoking "AML, BSA" as part of the protections the bill would enforce. The speaker argued clarity in U.S. regulation was needed so entrepreneurs would "build here in the United States of America, not be pushed offshore."
Throughout the remarks the lawmaker framed the outcome as a setback driven by partisan calculation: "This is exactly the kind of cynical Washington maneuvering that makes people sick to their stomach." The lawmaker closed by saying the effort would continue: "We will continue to work on the digital asset revolution that the American people voted for."
The speech records strong criticism of the Senate vote but does not include any response from other senators in the provided transcript. The transcript does not record a subsequent motion, vote tally on the floor, or a stated next procedural step beyond the speaker’s pledge to persist.
