Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Connectivity topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County economic‑development official outlines two‑year cellular overlay trial for downtown Glens Falls; board raises no safety objections

Glens Falls Board of Public Safety · May 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Warren County economic‑development staff described a state grant to install an overlay cellular network in downtown Glens Falls for two years. Board members asked about potential public‑safety risks and reported no objection to the project proceeding to council consideration.

Warren County economic‑development staff described a two‑year state grant May 13 to install a cellular overlay in downtown Glens Falls intended to expand capacity and reduce dead zones during large events.

Jim Sippelon explained the overlay would place weatherproof router/nodes on existing poles to create an alternate path for calls and data; users in coverage areas would be prompted to sign into the network to improve call completion during capacity spikes. The grant would fund installation as a trial for two years; the city would advance installation costs and be reimbursed by the state, then decide whether to assume ownership, have a third party operate equipment, or disable it after the trial.

Sippelon said the network is intended to increase bandwidth during events and alleviate chronic downtown coverage problems that have prevented transactions and successful calls at times. He estimated modest operating costs if the city were to assume long‑term responsibility and said vendors and the county EDC might be willing to help operate the network.

Board members asked whether expanded network access could create public‑safety risks. Steve Thurston and others noted the system is cellular (not public Wi‑Fi) and that the board’s role was advisory on safety; several members said they had no safety concerns. The board did not record formal objections and encouraged staff to note any operational or privacy concerns for the common council to consider.