Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bonding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House hearing reviews Senate language authorizing transportation bonds, asks for CDAC and treasurer analyses
Summary
Legislative counsel told the committee the Senate added language authorizing the treasurer to issue Transportation Infrastructure Bonds (TIB) subject to annual legislative approval and directing AOT, CDAC and the treasurer to report on projects that could be bonded and on the prudence of issuing debt; committee members raised questions about timing, revenue capacity and long'term debt risk.
The committee reviewed Senate language that would authorize the state treasurer to issue transportation infrastructure bonds in amounts approved annually by the General Assembly and require comparative analyses of projects with and without bonding.
"Section 13 authorizes issuance of transportation infrastructure bonds," Legislative Counsel Danny Leonard explained, adding the language would be subject to annual legislative approval. Counsel said the language mirrors the approach taken after the 2008 recession: authorize bond issuance subject to yearly legislative authorization and require the Capital Debt Affordability Committee and the treasurer to assess how much debt the TIB fund revenues could support.
Committee members sought clarity on whether the authorization is a policy signal or a near-term plan to increase program scale. Members worried bonding could shift short'term workloads earlier but saddled future budgets with debt-service costs if revenues decline. "There were also concerns raised about the cost of debt service and risks if the economy goes down and questions about how much the TIB fund can support," Leonard said.
Counsel and members noted safeguards: the CDAC and treasurer must annually report prudent maximum issuance, and any issuance must still receive separate legislative approval, which preserves oversight on debt limits and timing. The committee asked the counsel and staff to provide further written analysis and to coordinate with the treasurer's office when it appears before the committee.
What happens next: the committee expects more detail from the treasurer and CDAC analysis before deciding whether to accept the Senate'passed language, strike the authorization or reword it to require only a study and annual reporting.
