Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Enforcement Stipulations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Executive Ethics Board accepts multiple enforcement stipulations, including settlement tied to governor's travel

Washington State Executive Ethics Board · May 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Washington State Executive Ethics Board approved stipulations and reasonable-cause findings in several cases on May 8, 2026, including a $4,000 civil penalty (with $2,000 suspended) in a case involving Governor Bob Ferguson and a $2,500 stipulation (with $1,000 suspended) in a Department of Corrections employee matter.

The Washington State Executive Ethics Board on May 8 accepted a series of enforcement stipulations and issued multiple reasonable-cause findings across personnel-ethics complaints.

Board staff reported that case 2025061 involving Governor Bob Ferguson had produced a settlement imposing a $4,000 civil penalty, with $2,000 suspended on condition that the governor comply with the stipulation's terms and commit no further violations of RCW 42.52 for two years. A board member recused from that vote; the stipulation was accepted by the board.

The board also accepted a proposed stipulation in case 2025-032 concerning a Department of Corrections employee. Staff described an internal DOC investigation and records showing 6,374 text messages and 20 phone calls with the employee's spouse over a one-year period, plus roughly 306 photo files (about 10 potentially personal). Board staff said they had reached agreement on a $2,500 civil penalty with $1,000 suspended, conditioned on compliance with the stipulation and no further violations for two years. The board voted to accept that stipulation.

Board staff additionally summarized a complaint involving a state attorney who emailed an elementary school principal and others from a personal account while identifying themselves by title; the staff report said the individual admitted sending a single email and regretted the action. Staff reported a resolution that the record describes as a monetary agreement (transcript references a $1,000 amount with $250 suspended in the settlement language). The board moved to accept the stipulation presented on that matter.

Beyond those stipulations, the board recorded multiple reasonable-cause determinations and dismissals across a long list of matters. On the record the board: found reasonable cause (and a potential penalty above $500) for cases including Luz Marina Takata (2024009) and Preston Reese (2024-035); dismissed others as unfounded, including William Fiehle (2024-016) and Strader (2024038); and set additional matters for follow-up or hearing as reflected in the meeting record. The board also corrected a statutory citation in a default order and approved a final order imposing a $3,000 penalty where the numeric and written amounts needed alignment.

Several motions passed by voice vote after members offered brief comments and technical edits; minutes and advisory-opinion approvals were completed earlier in the meeting before the board recessed into closed session for quasi-judicial deliberations. A member asked that standard footnotes or statutory citations be added to advisory materials where legislative definitions had changed.

The board reconvened on the record after a closed session and announced the accepted stipulations and case dispositions. Several motions noted compliance conditions (two-year no-violation periods) tied to suspended portions of civil penalties.

The board's actions on May 8 cover enforcement outcomes and do not create new statutes; they record settlements and findings under the Ethics in Public Service Act (RCW 42.52). The meeting adjourned at 11:13 a.m.