Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Neighborhood Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee recommends Plan Hyde Park to City Council after multi‑year community process

Cincinnati City Council Housing and Growth Committee · March 31, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After years of community engagement, the Housing and Growth Committee filed Plan Hyde Park and recommended it to full City Council. Steering‑committee members emphasized preserving the Square's character while staff said the plan guides future decisions but does not itself change zoning.

The Housing and Growth Committee voted to file and forward Plan Hyde Park to full City Council with a recommendation for approval after presentations from city planning staff and neighborhood steering‑committee members.

Janet Booning, chair of the Plan Hyde Park steering committee, told the committee the plan reflects extensive engagement beginning in 2017 and urged the panel to “preserve the character of the square and the quality of the square as a true neighborhood business district.” Emily Burns of the Department of City Planning and Engagement said the document is a long‑range vision intended to guide decisions and make it easier to pursue grants; she reiterated that the plan does not itself change zoning.

Steering committee member Dave Apner walked the committee through the timeline and revisions, noting a draft presented in April 2025 and a final draft posted online on 2026‑01‑12. Planning staff highlighted that the plan organizes goals and actions into four focus areas — quality of life; how we move; Hyde Park Square; and built environment — and that the plan helps prioritize implementation, including partner roles and potential funding avenues.

Council members asked how implementation would be operationalized and sought clarification on specific recommendations. Burns and steering‑committee members described an implementation matrix that ranks actions by priority, difficulty and impact and listed likely community and city partners for each item. The committee discussed green‑space concepts for Hyde Park Square, including a community idea to shift traffic to expand pedestrian space, and staff noted any such change would require further study, interdepartmental coordination and significant community input.

Planning staff also reviewed maps showing current zoning and overlay districts; they said about 87% of the neighborhood is zoned single‑family, and noted that connected‑communities overlays cover substantial parts of Hyde Park, which informed conversation about potential conversions to two‑ to four‑family housing. Steering‑committee members raised affordability concerns tied to teardown/rebuild trends and tax abatements and supported ‘middle housing’ options as part of a balanced approach.

The committee completed a roll‑call on the item and filed Plan Hyde Park to be considered by full City Council with the committee’s recommendation for approval. The committee’s action was procedural to move the plan forward; specific final action remains with full council.