Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Childcare Cip topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council committees concur with executive on DHHS childcare CIP and prioritize MLK replacement
Summary
At a March 12 joint session, Montgomery County committees reviewed the executive—Y27—Y32 DHHS CIP, agreed to the executive's recommendations and directed staff follow-up; the administration reallocated out-year funds to prioritize a larger replacement at the MLK Recreation Park Center and moved several childcare sites out of the six-year schedule.
Get email alerts on the Childcare Cip topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a joint work session March 12, the Montgomery County Education and Culture Committee and the Health and Human Services Committee reviewed the county executive—ranch—Y27—Y32 capital improvement program for the Department of Health and Human Services and concurred with staff recommendations to accept the executive's project list.
The executive recommended $74,200,000 in DHHS capital spending over the six-year period, a $2,400,000 reduction from the prior CIP largely driven by project closeouts and by reconfiguring the childcare facility-replacement strategy, Council staff said. "The executive recommends a 6 year total of $74,200,000 for the fiscal year 27 to 32 CIP for DHHS," Nicole Rodriguez Hernandez, council staff, told the joint committee.
Why it matters: the reconfiguration shifts placeholder funding and site schedules to concentrate resources on a larger, costlier replacement at the MLK Recreation Park Center and to address ADA compliance and playground upgrades at county-run childcare sites. That reprioritization will change which centers receive capital work during the six-year window and has operating-budget implications the committee said must be reviewed during the operating budget cycle.
Key elements and numbers - ADA remediation: the executive proposed a $2,000,000 increase to ADA remediation costs for childcare sites, requesting $717,000 in FY27 and $360,000 in FY28; the source is general obligation bonds. - Playgrounds: the playgrounds subproject shows a $1,700,000 increase (27.7%) in total project cost with a requested $51,000 appropriation in FY27 and $1,900,000 in FY28. - Facility replacement: the facility replacement subproject shows a $17,500,000 decrease to the total project cost (37.5%) in the six-year period while recommending a $9,100,000 appropriation in FY27; the executive said it removed placeholder funding for six previously included replacement sites to concentrate on MLK.
Officials said the MLK Recreation Park Center replacement grew in scope to accommodate more childcare seats and expanded age ranges, which increased cost and complexity. "We will focus all the available funding on the MLK Recreation Park site with construction expected to start in fiscal year 27 and last about 20 months," Nicole Rodriguez Hernandez said. Greg Austin of the Department of General Services added that the MLK project requires reconfiguring park property, replacing some park amenities and building a larger facility than originally planned.
Committee members pressed for clarity about which projects were delayed rather than canceled and asked how equity factored into site selection. "We do look at overall need across the county, in terms of what's already available and what's not," Laurie Garabe Aquino, chief for children, youth and families at DHHS, said, explaining that the programmatic office weighs need and provider impact when prioritizing sites.
Cost pressures were cited as a driver of the revised schedule. "We received bids for the Lawton Center and they came in $120,000 over the estimate," David Dice, Director of General Services, told the committee, noting DGS is working with OMB to adjust estimates as bid results arrive.
What the committee asked for next: staff concurred with the executive recommendation but the joint committee requested additional detail on site challenges, affordability alternatives for the six sites removed from the facility replacement schedule, and follow-up on implementation timelines. Council members also noted operating-budget impacts and asked that the committee revisit staffing and operating implications during the operating-budget work sessions.
The joint session accepted the council staff recommendation to concur with the executive's CIP proposal for these childcare projects "without objection," and the Education and Culture Committee adjourned so HHS could continue its review on the operating side.
Ending: The committees will revisit these projects during operating-budget sessions and when the interdepartmental work group reports back with affordability alternatives and site-specific implementation plans.
