Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission asks counsel about virtual attendance rules, schedules extra meetings and plans public notice
Summary
Facing tight deadlines and member absences, the Vermilion commission agreed to set extra meetings, use Microsoft Teams for remote participation where permitted, and ask legal counsel whether virtual attendees can count for quorum or votes under ORC 121.22.
As the commission moved into detailed article assignments it also focused on logistics: meeting dates, publicizing sessions, and whether virtual attendance via Teams will be lawful and sufficient for quorum or voting.
Staff reminded members that Ohio's Open Meetings Act (ORC 121.22) governs virtual participation and that exceptions used during the COVID pandemic required express local procedures or emergency authorization. One staff member summarized the statutory constraint: "It's the Ohio sunshine law with open meetings," and the panel discussed whether non‑elected, unpaid boards have broader exceptions.
The commission tentatively scheduled a set of April meetings (including the 20th and the 30th) and agreed to post agendas that specify which articles will be discussed at each session so the public can attend those meetings most relevant to them. Commissioners and staff also agreed to ask counsel whether virtual members can be counted for quorum and whether votes must wait for in‑person presence.
Next steps: Staff will publicize the confirmed schedule, circulate agendas tied to specific charter articles, and request a written legal opinion on the effect of virtual participation on quorum and voting under ORC 121.22.
