Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission keeps existing emergency-ordinance limits after debate; one member votes no
Summary
After debate over whether emergency-ordinance restrictions could block time‑sensitive grants and projects, the commission voted to retain the proposed language and rely on counsel for final wording; one commissioner recorded a dissenting vote.
The charter review commission debated revisions to the section governing emergency ordinances, with several members warning that broad limits could prevent quick action needed to accept grants or begin time‑sensitive projects.
During discussion commissioners noted the charter's existing language restricting emergency measures for zoning, franchises and certain fiscal actions, and considered expanding or narrowing those subject-matter restrictions. One commissioner warned that strict restrictions could cause the city to lose grant windows or delay engineering and bidding on infrastructure projects.
After discussion, a motion to leave the section largely unchanged and to rely on counsel for final drafting passed. During the roll call one commissioner said, "I was I'm gonna say no. I'm still not happy with this," which the clerk recorded as a negative vote; the motion nevertheless carried by a majority.
What happens next: Staff will forward the commission's recommendation to the law director for wording and the commission will review counsel's draft at a future meeting.
