Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates draft book-fair materials policy; librarians, vendors and inventories at issue
Summary
The board discussed draft policy KLB-BF on book-fair materials selection and the related regulation on library purchases; members said the policy aims for division-wide consistency but debated whether vendors should be required to provide a complete inventory or whether librarians should vet vendor catalogs.
Superintendent Shepherd presented a draft policy (KLB-BF) on the selection and approval of book-fair materials and said the item will return for consideration at the June 11 meeting. Board members supporting the draft said a consistent division-wide approach is needed because practices varied school to school; proponents also said oversight reduces implied endorsement of items sold on school property.
Some librarians and PTA members had been consulted by email, the superintendent said, but at least one librarian had raised concerns about not being consulted in person. Board members asked whether the policy would be "overburdensome" for volunteers running book fairs and whether the policy should mirror the existing library book-review policy.
A central point of debate was whether the policy should require vendors (for example, Scholastic) to provide a complete inventory of items that would be made available to students and parents, or whether providing links to vendor catalogs would be sufficient. One board member said vendors maintain different online catalogs and could provide multiple lists, which raises the risk that librarians or parents might not see the exact items that appear at a fair. Another member suggested requiring a purchase list or written inventory from vendors so librarians know what will be available for students.
The board discussed operational responsibility: the draft policy states the board maintains final authority over materials made available to students but does not intend routine item-by-item pre-approval. The superintendent said attorney input shaped that language and that staff review procedures would handle individual questions and red flags.
Board members agreed there is room for further redrafting (for example, to clarify vendor requirements and how local vendors with no online catalog will comply). Shepherd said the librarians had posted a final draft library materials purchase list for review and that the final approved library purchase list will be recommended for approval in June.
No formal vote was taken at this meeting; members asked that staff and legal counsel refine the language on vendor-provided inventories and operational implementation prior to the June meeting.
