Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Honors Program topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears proposal to standardize middle‑school honors with readiness indicators

Redondo Beach Unified School District Board of Education · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff proposed a districtwide purpose statement, instructional guidance and 'readiness indicators' for middle‑school honors, saying honors will continue but with clearer placement criteria; the board asked for an appeals (administrative review) process and a phased rollout.

Redondo Beach Unified presented the results of a middle‑school honors evaluation and a proposal to define honors consistently across sites, align instructional expectations and establish readiness indicators that students must meet to qualify.

Assistant Superintendent Dr. Allison Garland and Executive Director Roy Lopez Jr. said the working group surveyed teachers and reviewed student outcomes from 8th into 9th grade, concluding that honors courses should remain but with greater consistency. The proposed honors purpose statement describes honors as appropriately challenging coursework for students who demonstrate advanced academic skills and readiness in ELA and social studies.

Committee members recommended a set of instructional guidelines (deeper instruction, streamlined content, advanced independence, faster pacing, collaborative dialogue and synthesized application) and a placement model using four readiness indicators. Presenters said students would need to meet three of four indicators (examples: district reading diagnostic at grade‑level or above, demonstrated performance on a CAASPP‑aligned measure, passing scores in ELA or social studies courses aligned to the honors subject area, and a district writing assessment with rubric) to qualify for honors placement. Staff said an administrative review (appeal) process will be available for families who disagree with placement decisions.

Board members asked several clarifying questions, including whether the indicators would prevent later entry into honors (presenters said students may move into honors in subsequent years) and whether the English/social studies indicators mirror math placement practices. Sarah Aldini, a committee member, added that the indicators are meant to target students “who consistently read above grade level and demonstrate advanced writing skills,” not to exclude other students who later demonstrate readiness.

Staff provided a phased timeline: implement teacher instructional guidance next year; communicate readiness indicators to families; and activate indicators for students entering seventh grade in a subsequent year so the policy roll‑out is gradual. The board did not vote on the proposal; it was presented for review and will return with final recommendations and supports for communication and staff training.

What’s next: Staff will finalize pacing guides, a writing assessment and parent information sessions before indicators take effect for the first cohort.