Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservation Easement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves 243‑acre conservation easement for property near Crawfish Valley
Summary
Wythe County Planning Commission voted to approve a conservation easement offered by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation for roughly 240–243 acres owned by Ernest C. Muser IV, limiting future subdivision and development and protecting riparian buffers and habitat.
Get email alerts on the Conservation Easement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Wythe County Planning Commission on May 4 approved a conservation easement proposed by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation (VOF) for roughly 240–243 acres owned by Ernest C. Muser IV in the Black Lick/Crawfish Valley area.
VOF representative Harry Hibbitz told the commission the easement—if accepted by VOF's board and recorded—would restrict subdivision of the parcel to preserve natural resources. "The easement will limit development potential," Hibbitz said, explaining the deed would typically allow a single house, reduce allowable development footprint, and establish buffers along waterways.
The VOF representative said easements held by the foundation are perpetual and transfer with the land. He described rules for timbering inside VOF easements—owners must submit a pre‑harvest or forest plan and comply with best management practices coordinated with the Virginia Department of Forestry. Hibbitz also noted potential tax incentives available to landowners who place land under easement.
Commissioners asked whether the property could be sold and whether an easement could later be removed or modified. Hibbitz said a sale does not remove an easement; the restriction remains with the property. He said extinguishing or diverting an easement is complex, often requiring judicial proceedings and replacement or substitution of conserved land, and that tax credits could be recaptured if a previously recorded easement were later removed.
The easement application cites conservation benefits for water quality and wildlife habitat, including targeted protections intended to benefit species such as the Golden‑winged warbler. Hibbitz said the parcel backs up to the national forest and that the proposal includes broad restrictions across the whole tract plus targeted riparian buffers to limit timbering and development near streams.
A commissioner moved to approve the easement; another seconded, and the commission approved it by voice vote.
The VOF project will next proceed to the foundation's trustees for consideration; Hibbitz said the project is tentatively on the VOF board agenda for June.

