Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Science Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District recommends phenomenon‑based, open‑resource science curriculum and phased pilots
Summary
Curriculum staff recommended a shift to phenomenon‑based science instruction using open educational resources for K–6 and a phased secondary pilot; the approach prioritizes classroom materials, teacher professional learning and lower five‑year costs versus traditional vendor packages.
Tooele curriculum staff recommended the district adopt a phenomenon‑based science curriculum that emphasizes students 'doing science' over memorization and shifts assessments toward inquiry‑driven tasks.
Presenters explained that modern standards expect students to develop models and design experiments rather than simply recall facts, and showed sample assessment items illustrating that change. Current district science materials were described as inadequate, with little or no K–3 curriculum in place.
The curriculum committee evaluated several options and recommended an Open Education Resource (OER) approach (Open‑SED/OpenSci) for elementary grades because it meets the district’s instructional goals while reducing textbook licensing costs. Staff emphasized that 'free' curriculum content does not eliminate expense: initial outlays are expected for classroom materials and a robust professional learning package that will prepare teachers to implement phenomenon‑based lessons. The recommended path calls for pilot classrooms in year one, expanded rollout in year two, and full implementation in subsequent years; for students not in pilot classrooms, staff said they will continue with current materials for one additional year with added early‑elementary supports.
Board members asked about teacher flexibility; staff responded that teachers retain discretion to adapt lessons but should not depart from core curriculum expectations or state standards. The item will be placed on the June agenda for a formal adoption vote and detailed budgeting.
What’s next: the board will review cost estimates and the pilot plan at the June meeting before a formal adoption vote.
