Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Anoka County approves transportation agreements and $1.17M parks contract in consent vote
Summary
The county board approved a consent slate that included Resolution 2026-TR09 (an advanced construction agreement with MnDOT), a contract amendment with TKDA for Blaine intersection work, a joint powers agreement with Ramsey County for an overlay program, and a $1,171,830.97 parks contract for lazy-river bridge replacement.
Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Anoka County commissioners approved a multi-item consent slate in a single roll-call vote, advancing several transportation agreements and a parks construction contract.
On transportation, Commissioner Heinrich presented three items: Resolution 2026-TR09 to enter an advanced construction agreement with MnDOT for a pavement preservation project on Main Street Northwest (from the Highway 10 bridge to a point about 400 feet east of Creek Boulevard in the city of Rapids as stated in the record); an amendment to Anoka County contract C0011952A with TKDA for intersection improvements on Rison Road and 109th and Davenport Street in the city of Blaine; and a joint powers agreement with Ramsey County for a countywide overlay program covering County Road J (85th Avenue) from Lexington Avenue to Renova Street Northeast in the cities of Blaine and Shoreview.
On parks, the board approved contract number 26-1044 in the amount of $1,171,830.97 to Eert Construction for a lazy-river bridge replacement and associated mechanical building upgrades. Commissioner Reiner moved the parks item; the full slate was moved and seconded, and the board voted unanimously to approve the consent items.
Why it matters: the transportation agreements enable pavement preservation, design coordination, and inter-county overlay work; the parks contract funds a multi-year capital repair at a county facility. The record notes the county considered extra design costs for the TKDA amendment as warranted by project coordination needs.
Next steps: the approved agreements authorize staff to execute the contracts and continue project development; the meeting record does not include contract start dates, completion dates, or detailed funding sources for each item.

