Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Boise City annexes 9501 W. Bernett Drive, approves three-lot subdivision over neighbor objections
Summary
Council approved annexation and preliminary/final plat for ~1.66–2 acres at 9501 W. Bernett Drive (R1B/AIO) with a 4–1 vote after neighbors raised concerns about density, parking and road safety; developer said design review will address details.
Boise City Council voted 4–1 to annex roughly 1.665–2 acres at 9501 West Bernett Drive and approve a three-lot preliminary and final plat, concluding a public hearing marked by substantial neighbor opposition.
Planning staff presented findings recommending annexation to R1B/AIO and said the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and adjacent zoning. Staff noted planned road improvements on Victory Road and recommended conditions including sidewalks and landscape buffers.
Tanner Verhooks, an applicant representative, told council the annexation is the first step toward a cottage-village product and that future design-review applications will address parking, landscaping and other site details. Robin Gates, the developer, said the cottage units are intended as for-sale homes — not a low-income rental project — and emphasized prior experience with cottage projects.
Neighbors said the scale and density proposed (roughly 14 units plus the existing house in one conceptual layout) would be out of place amid adjacent larger-lot residential parcels. Carol McFaden, who lives at 9500 West Bernett Drive, and other neighbors cited narrow roadways, limited off-street parking, winter safety on Quirkus/Bernett and potential pressure on nearby schools and services.
"The parking is not adequate," said Carol McFaden, noting the proposed plan showed about one parking space per unit and narrow local lanes.
Council members who supported annexation said the site is appropriate for infill and that required roadway and infrastructure improvements (including a half-street improvement and future highway-district improvements) will mitigate safety and parking concerns. Council member Willlet recorded a no vote, saying the annexation raised unresolved questions about process and county review.
The motion to approve the annexation and subdivision carried 4–1. Staff and applicants will proceed to subsequent development applications (design review and detailed site plans) where parking, fences, buffers and construction impacts will be addressed.
