Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners mark candidate sites for neighborhood commercial and consider vesting the general plan
Summary
Staff said North Ogden already has a neighborhood commercial code but needs mapped locations; commissioners marked candidate corridors (Monroe/3100, parcels near 2750 trailhead and equestrian park) and discussed using vesting or a general-plan map change to guide future rezoning.
City staff told the Planning Commission that North Ogden’s neighborhood commercial code already lists permitted uses — small retail under 10,000 square feet, animal clinics (no outdoor pens), restaurants (not fast-food), small offices, coffee shops without drive-throughs, studios and bed-and-breakfasts — but the general plan lacks clearly mapped areas where those uses should be directed.
Scott Hes, the city’s community and economic development director, said the code language exists (Title 11-10A-1B) but the missing step is 'where on the map' those neighborhood commercial (NC) parcels should sit. He presented examples of traditional neighborhood-commercial pockets (a long-standing cafe/merchantile, a veterinary clinic embedded in a neighborhood, and walkable urban examples such as Salt Lake City's '15th & 15th') and noted the trout farm as a locally notable commercial gathering place that currently sits in unincorporated county land but functions like a neighborhood commercial asset.
Commissioners and staff discussed specific candidate areas for NC designation, including stretches of Monroe Boulevard/3100, parcels near 1700 & Monroe that were part of a recent subdivision discussion, and a contiguous cluster of city-owned parcels south of the equestrian park and the new 2750 North trailhead. Staff highlighted that small commercial uses typically generate much higher property-tax revenue per acre than equivalent residential acreage and that aligning a local land-use map with WFRC's Wasatch Choice regional vision improves prospects for transportation funding.
Staff described 'vesting' the general plan as an option — a parcel-by-parcel future land-use commitment that would make the general plan more prescriptive (what staff called the most robust option) — and cautioned it is a significant, legislative choice. The recommended near-term process is a planning commission workshop using large-format maps, commissioner input (staff asked commissioners to mark candidate areas and email their notes), and then a map-driven recommendation to the City Council for potential general-plan and rezoning actions.
What happens next: staff will assemble workshop materials and return with a draft land-use map recommendation to present to the commission and then to the council; no formal legislative action was taken during the meeting.
