Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Enrollment Jefferson topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parents urge board to address falling enrollment at Jefferson elementary; request task force and program options

Richland School District Board of Directors · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Parents told the Richland School District board that Jefferson Elementary is losing students and asked the district to form a task force to examine enrollment drivers, boundary and transfer policies, and program options such as dual-language or specialized offerings to draw families back.

At the Richland School District board meeting, parents urged the board to take a proactive approach to declining enrollment at Jefferson Elementary, asking for transparent analysis and a district-supported task force to explore causes and solutions.

"We want our children to be part of a stable, thriving school community," said Angela Gregoric, a Jefferson parent, during the public-comment period. Gregoric said volunteer parents have assembled preliminary enrollment trend research and are asking the board to investigate why families in North Richland are choosing alternatives such as homeschooling, private schools or transfers within the district. She urged a task force to examine enrollment trends, boundary and transfer policies, and program options and to engage families in developing solutions.

Danielle Green, another Jefferson parent, said the problem is not a lack of neighborhood children but that families are opting for other options. She warned that ongoing reactive staffing reductions threaten programs and instruction, and recommended the district consider limiting but not banning in-district transfers, and piloting specialty programs—dual language, school gardens or other offerings—that might encourage families to stay. "We need programs," Green said. "It could be dual language. This could be gardens—something that entices these families to choose our public schools."

Board members responded that the district is already collecting related data and that a facilities task force is examining district capacity. Members asked staff for more detailed data: a building-level snapshot using the October enrollment submission, a multi-year view of in-district transfers (net flows), and a list of empty classrooms and current choice programs (Home Link, River's Edge) to assess capacity for new offerings. Ruby, a district staffer, circulated preliminary in-district transfer counts showing Jefferson had 13 transfers in and 12 out this year (net +1), but board members asked for a multi-year cumulative view to detect trends.

The board discussed exploring targeted programs to attract families and asked administrators and the facilities task force to evaluate program feasibility and unused space. Several directors said any task force or program-review should include substantial parent engagement.

What’s next: Board asked staff to provide a multi-year transfer analysis, building-level class-size and capacity snapshots (October data recommended), and an inventory of underused classrooms to inform whether to pilot new choice programs for Jefferson.