Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment And Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gilmer County presents early‑year benchmark results, discipline trends and plans for interventions
Summary
District administrators presented K‑12 benchmark results showing mixed early‑year placement levels, discussed discipline trends (72 high‑school referrals to date and a rise in bullying/technology‑misuse reports), and outlined gate reviews, interventions and plans to address attendance and behavior.
District leaders presented assessment, discipline and intervention updates for the current school year.
Miss West opened the data review with the district’s first benchmark window: "This is Benchmark data — our first Benchmark of the school year," she said, and noted the district uses ISL for grades 9–12 and I‑Ready for K–8. Administrators warned that platform timing and CTE scheduling mean some high‑school students were not assessed during the same window; they said printed data folders were sent home and teachers are performing standards‑level analysis using Cambium and other reporting tools.
Presenters described the K‑8 standard/placement view, where a portion of middle‑grade students placed one or more grade levels below the expected level (for example, the speaker cited roughly 37% one level below and 15% ahead in a grade sample). Elementary placements were described as more promising in aggregate, and the district is rolling out the third‑grade success work and a numeracy rollout aligned with state guidance. Miss West said the system can generate lists of students flagged for possible dyslexia for follow‑up screening and that interventions such as targeted phonics screeners and vocabulary/instructional supports are being implemented.
On discipline, administration reported that Gilmer County High School had 72 referrals in the first six weeks and countywide discipline referrals are down from historical two‑to‑three‑hundred levels some years ago. However, the district flagged a rise in bullying/harassment entries (now being entered consistently into WVEIS after a civil‑rights review) and an increase in technology misuse incidents. A presenter said, without naming students, that staff had identified at least one case where a student used artificial intelligence to circumvent filtering and access inappropriate content; the district said its filters are effective on the network but cannot control off‑network access and that they will retrain students on acceptable use.
Superintendent Dr Manny said the district will perform gate reviews twice a year, will provide monthly discipline trend reports to the board and is developing an interventions packet for bullying/harassment cases and protective orders when appropriate. He also reported district enrollment at 732 students and a year‑to‑date attendance rate of 93.2 percent with chronic absenteeism at 22.13 percent.
Board members pressed for data‑driven interventions — including grade‑level teams using Cambium reports to identify standards of weakness — and administrators described plans for targeted meetings with freshman and sophomore cohorts, credit recovery and tutoring schedules.
Next steps: the district will continue monthly reporting, execute the planned gate reviews and produce intervention tracking that links discipline trends to specific interventions.
