Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Security Cameras topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

York County picks lower-cost 5MP camera system for courthouse after debate over resolution and retention

York County Board of Commissioners / Board of Equalization · May 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After reviewing two competitive bids, the York County board voted to accept Saurin Group's 5-megapixel camera system (about $66,385) instead of a higher-resolution Applied Connective system (~$114,989), citing cost and comfort expressed by courthouse users; switches will be purchased with ARPA funds and servers procured by year-end.

York County commissioners selected a courthouse security camera system from Saurin Group following a debate over image resolution, storage needs and long-term value.

Josh of the sheriff's department presented bid results and said seven vendors inspected the site; the county narrowed proposals to two contenders. Saurin Group submitted a 5-megapixel system at roughly $66,385, which exceeds the county's 1080p requirement and was described as acceptable by the call center and law enforcement. Applied Connective offered an 8-megapixel option that Applied priced initially at roughly $100,989 for motion-only recording and raised to about $114,989 to provide full-time recording by increasing server storage.

Josh said the higher-resolution system would increase image clarity and retention but would cost about $47,000 more than the lower bid. Commissioners discussed tradeoffs: higher megapixels increase storage needs but improve zoom/detail and potential evidentiary value, while the lower-cost bid met operational requirements and came from a vendor already servicing courthouse systems. Andy said he could not justify the $48,000 premium for higher resolution and favored the lower bid; Paul and others noted the value of higher resolution but acknowledged procurement and budget constraints.

A motion to accept the Saurin Group proposal and to purchase associated switches with ARPA funds passed on a roll-call vote; the board also directed staff to move forward with server procurement and other implementation steps before year-end. No commissioner votes against or abstentions were recorded.