Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews redlined administrator handbook and phased pay-schedule proposal

Riverside Local School District board meeting · May 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented redlined edits to administrator and exempt/confidential handbooks, including role retitling, a proposed $30 monthly cell-phone stipend for administrators, and a multi-year plan to move exempt staff onto tiered specialist pay schedules to improve competitiveness.

Board members reviewed a redlined draft of the administrator handbook and a companion exempt/confidential handbook that would retitle many back-office positions and place them on a phased, tiered pay schedule.

Staff said the redline updates streamline job descriptions, remove references to a consortium the district no longer uses, and create clearer step-placement guidelines for administrators. On equipment and communications, staff proposed replacing district-paid phones with a monthly stipend for administrators expected to be available after hours. Staff noted a $30-a-month stipend as a lower-end, researched estimate designed to reduce costs and the burden of employees carrying two devices.

The exempt/confidential handbook proposal would retitle many positions to "specialist," place roles into tiers based on skills and market comparators, and phase-market adjustments over multiple years instead of a single, disruptive one-time pay increase. Staff emphasized the approach is intended to be sustainable, cite difficulty recruiting for some specialist roles, and make later shared-services pricing easier to calculate.

Board members asked for fiscal impact estimates; staff said they had not completed full costing the night before and promised to deliver numbers to the board before final approval. Members also discussed guardrails: the board will approve step placements and can phase increases based on revenue availability, freezes, or ballot timing.

The meeting did not adopt formal changes; staff will return with detailed cost estimates and proposed implementation timelines.