Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Central council hears detailed plan and financing options for a full-time police department

City Council of Central · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff presented a recommended ‘‘blended' model for a full-time Central Police Department—44 employees, about $4.6 million annual operations and $1.4 million startup—offset in part by a proposed municipal court ($1.3M estimate) and school-zone speed camera revenue; council discussed grants and a multi-year transition.

Officer John Doier of the Central Police Department presented the Fleck Committee's recommendation for future law enforcement in Central, proposing a "blended" full-time municipal department with 32 full-time and 12 part-time employees (44 total). He said the department would include uniform patrol on 12-hour shifts, detectives, full-time dispatch and support staff and estimated annual operating costs at about $4.625 million and startup costs near $1.4 million.

Doier framed the recommendation by citing a prior municipal experiment in New Iberia to warn of potential pitfalls of contracting primary policing to a parish sheriff. He said New Iberia disbanded its department in 2004 to contract with the sheriff and later reestablished a department in 2018 after concerns about service levels and local accountability.

Why it matters: City leaders face a choice between continuing a contract with the parish sheriff or investing in a permanent municipal agency. Doier and committee members argued a local department offers tailored patrol strategies, control over recruitment and training, dedicated data ownership and long-term asset building; opponents and some council members raised concerns about startup costs, legacy retirement obligations and recruitment competition with nearby departments.

Funding options presented included: a municipal court (estimated conservatively at about $1.3 million annually if enforcement levels scale with a full-time force) and automated school-zone speed-camera revenue from a vendor, Blue Line Solutions. Doier said Blue Line's sample testing recorded 24,167 vehicles during school-zone hours in a five-day study; after conservative adjustments the company projected a nine-month revenue figure of roughly $4.635 million gross, with the city's 60% share around $2.7 million (Doier noted conservative planning could reduce that to $500,000).

Council members pressed staff on several details. They asked about realistic chief-salary ranges (comparisons to neighboring cities ranged from about $92,000 to $150,000 depending on municipal size), the size of a required facility and grant availability for startup costs. Staff said they have applied for two grants (one identified at roughly $300,000 in the packet) and identified a grant that could cover 75% of officer salaries for three years and another specifically for construction and equipment.

Several council members said a full-time department could be feasible in the medium term (five to 10 years) if grant funding and other revenues bridge the startup gap; others favored remaining with the sheriff in the near term while planning a measured transition. No formal action or vote was taken; the item was recorded as a non-action presentation and discussion.

Ending: Council members asked staff to continue refining financial assumptions, pursue identified grants and return with further analysis. The council did not vote; the presentation will inform future budget workshops and deliberations.