Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Arts Programming topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Local poets and a photography instructor press commission for arts programs

Public Arts Commission · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two public commenters urged the commission to expand cultural programming: Claire Chu proposed creating a two‑year Cathedral City poet laureate and offered to serve; Barbara Basavan proposed a community‑based photography center focused on underserved youth and asked for help finding grants and partnerships.

Two members of the public used the commission’s public‑comment period on May 12 to propose new arts initiatives for Cathedral City.

Claire Chu, who identified herself as co‑president of the Perez Art District and a published poet, proposed the creation of a two‑year poet laureate position for Cathedral City and offered to serve as the inaugural laureate. “I believe poetry can strengthen community, civic identity, and cultural connection,” Chu said, and described organizing readings and open mics that drew strong attendance. She closed by reading a brief poem to illustrate how the role might engage residents and schools.

Barbara Basavan, a visual artist and adjunct photography professor at College of the Desert, asked the commission to help identify grants and partnerships to launch a community‑based photography center in the Perez Art District. Basavan said the center would offer darkroom and digital classes, mentorships, workshops with visiting professionals, and equipment access with a special emphasis on underserved youth; she said she is forming a 501(c)(3) and invited the commission to an exhibit of her advanced students scheduled for May 22.

Commissioners thanked both speakers, asked brief clarifying questions about funding requests and facilities, and noted those suggestions when discussing future community programming. No formal action was taken; both proposals were recorded during public comment and may be considered for future agenda items or funding opportunities.