Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan Vision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates vision wording, tribal recognition and priorities for housing, transportation and utilities
Summary
Members reviewed the existing 2016 vision statement and goals; several urged reordering to prioritize natural resources and to explicitly acknowledge tribal neighbors, and the committee discussed consolidating housing objectives and adding climate resilience and tax-exempt mapping elements to transportation and utilities chapters.
The Ashland County Planning Committee spent the meeting reviewing the comprehensive plan's vision statement and topic goals, with members urging clearer language to reflect the county's rural and natural-resource priorities and to acknowledge tribal neighbors.
Emily (Northwest Regional Planning) read the 2016 vision statement and noted the document looks ahead through 2036. Committee members said the emphasis in the bold vision paragraph could be reorganized to reflect citizen survey results that highlighted natural resources and rural character. One member summarized the tension, urging that economic development remain important but not dominant: "Economic development is what keeps this county moving ... but this is a values and vision-driven opportunity," a committee member said, calling for the bullets to be reordered to reflect survey priorities.
Members pressed to include explicit reference to tribal neighbors (Bad River) in the vision language. Several requested staff draft a short addition acknowledging tribal sovereignty and the tribe's separate comprehensive plan, and to bring examples from other counties that have formal tribal-relationship language.
On housing objectives, members flagged redundancy among A-F and suggested consolidating similar items (for example, folding energy-efficiency goals into broader housing objectives) and adding language on climate resilience and workforce recruitment to retain professionals.
In transportation, debate centered on phrasing for a proposed goal to "ensure year-round safe and efficient movement." Members agreed to prioritize public safety and community character, to include objective language on heavy-load impacts to roads from farms and logging, and to preserve emphasis on culvert upgrades and climate resilience. The committee also discussed recreational trails and a federal grant to add bike lanes near Clam Lake to Melon as an example of an existing, funded project.
On utilities and community facilities, members recommended adding an objective on utilities resilience and adaptability in anticipation of extreme weather, and discussed evaluating (but not endorsing) emerging technologies such as broadband expansion or large energy/data projects; members emphasized the need for local input and clarity about county authority before taking positions.
Staff said they will draft revisions reflecting today's suggestions (reordering vision bullets, a tribal recognition sentence, consolidated housing objectives, and strengthened transport/utilities language) and circulate the updated text to committee members for review before the next meeting.
