Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County briefs board on domestic violence program; presenters report lower recidivism among graduates

Douglas County Board of Commissioners · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Douglas County probation staff described a 24-week domestic violence program with a 75% graduation rate and lower three-year felony recidivism for graduates (6%) compared with the countywide average (15%); the board received the presentation and asked clarifying questions about costs and non-citizen participation.

Willie Swanson, a district supervisor, and facilitator Brian Lockach presented Douglas County's court-mandated domestic violence program to the board, describing program length, participant costs and outcomes.

Swanson said the program runs 24 weeks, with clients paying $25 per week. Since 2021 the program has produced 47 graduates and maintains a roughly 75% graduation rate. Swanson said graduates have better post-release outcomes: over a tracked three-year period, 6% of graduates committed a new felony compared with a 15% statewide average for discharged probation populations; only about 10% of program graduates ever committed a new domestic-violence offense versus roughly 30% among those who did not complete comparable programming.

Commissioners asked about the participation of non-citizens and potential deportation or immigration consequences. Staff said non-citizens on supervised probation participate while in the county; if immigration enforcement intervenes that is a separate process. The presenters said the program is lower-cost than similar private programs and credited favorable recidivism metrics to the structured curriculum and facilitator work.

The board thanked staff and the facilitators. No formal action was requested; the presentation was informational and the board discussed benefits to public safety and the jail-cost tradeoffs associated with successful rehabilitation.