Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Order Unruly Gatherings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Westchester committee weighs 'unruly social gathering' ordinance to curb off‑campus parties
Summary
Committee members discussed drafting a civil ordinance to give police a faster tool to break up or penalize large disruptive gatherings, debated definitions and overlap with existing nuisance and rental point‑systems, and heard residents urge prompt action and careful legal review.
The Westchester Public Safety & Quality of Life Committee opened a substantive debate on a proposed "unruly social gathering" ordinance intended to give police a civil mechanism to address house parties and other large, disruptive gatherings that spill into streets and alleys.
Chair Brian Travis said the measure would be a short‑term tool aimed at gatherings that become "disruptive, dangerous or disorderly," and noted similar ordinances in other college towns. Travis said the ordinance would target the event itself — not replace the borough’s existing point system tied to rental licenses — and stressed the need for clear definitions and legal alignment with current nuisance and noise codes.
Police Chief Josh Lee outlined the pattern local officers are seeing: nuisance crimes and public‑drunkenness incidents rise in April and May, concentrated in the southeast neighborhood and often between midnight and 4 a.m. He told the committee that the department has increased foot and bicycle patrols and that an enforceable event threshold could help officers break up a party faster.
Residents who spoke at the meeting urged quick action. Carol, chairperson of the neighborhood association CASE, urged the committee to review potential contradictions between the borough’s noise rules in chapter 73 and zoning language in chapter 112 before sending the ordinance to the solicitor. Longtime resident Jim Sergeant said student drinking pushed off campus by the university contributes to the problem and argued that overlap between enforcement tools is preferable to inaction.
Committee members debated technical choices such as whether to define a gathering as four or more people, what types of conduct would trigger enforcement (for example, underage alcohol consumption, noise beyond property lines, obstruction of public rights‑of‑way), and how to avoid double penalties when the rental point system applies. The committee agreed to continue research with the solicitor and the police department and to return to the item next month for draft language and potential referral to full council.
The committee emphasized the need to coordinate the new ordinance with existing chapter 66 rental rules and other nuisance language so that event‑based enforcement complements — rather than duplicates — longer‑term property sanctions.
