Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palatka historic board refuses after‑the‑fact DOT 'America 250' sign in North Historic District
Summary
The Palatka Historic Preservation Board voted March 5, 2026, to deny an after‑the‑fact Certificate of Appropriateness for a Florida Department of Transportation 'America 250' sign placed at the Bronson Maholland House, citing preservation concerns and urging relocation outside the historic district.
The Palatka Historic Preservation Board voted on March 5, 2026, to deny an after‑the‑fact Certificate of Appropriateness for a Florida Department of Transportation 'America 250' sign installed in front of the Bronson Maholland House at 110 Madison Street North in the North Historic District.
Board member Chris Hollister moved "that we do not approve the COA," a motion seconded by Miss Pavville; the board adopted the motion by voice vote. Staff had presented the application as an after‑the‑fact request and said the applicant on record was the city (the property owner) and that DOT had consulted public works before placing the sign.
The board and several public commenters questioned DOT’s decision to place a standard, metal, red‑white‑and‑blue 250th‑anniversary marker on the historic parcel. "It's really a disgusting sign," one attendee said during the hearing; Putnam County Historical Society board member Miss Kitchens urged moving the marker off the Bronson Maholland House parcel, saying the installation "dishonors the historic district." Bob Morgan, a local resident, called the sign a "nice gesture" but said it was unattractive for the site.
Staff noted the sign is part of a statewide America 250 program and that DOT supplied the language and graphics. Board members emphasized that had the marker been placed outside the historic district there would have been no need for a COA, and several suggested relocation to city right‑of‑way or private property as alternatives.
The DOT representative named in the application was not present at the meeting. The board’s action denies the COA; staff advised the board’s role was to approve or deny the certificate and that direct relocation would fall to public works or the property owner.
The denial means the sign must be removed from the historic parcel unless the applicant pursues an alternative remedy; staff and board members recommended DOT or city public‑works staff relocate the sign to a site outside the historic district where it would not require a COA.
