Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Vacation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tampa council approves Hyde Park alley vacation after residents warn of trash and historic‑street impacts
Summary
Council voted to vacate an alley in Hyde Park near Bay and Swann despite resident opposition citing garbage collection, parking access and preservation of brick streets; the motion passed with Councilman Bill Carlson voting no and Councilwoman Young absent.
The Tampa City Council voted March 5 to vacate an alley in Hyde Park bounded by Swann Avenue, Bay Street, Brevard Avenue and Magnolia Avenue (file VAC‑25‑08), a move opposed by nearby residents who said the alley is essential for trash pickup, parking access and protection of adjacent historic brick streets.
Attorney Kami Corbett, representing the applicant property owners of nearby office buildings, said the applicant added the easements council requested and that Solid Waste had written there was no present need for continued alley service. Several residents, including Pam Cannella and Bobbie O’Brien, urged council to preserve the alley while a site plan or alternate access arrangements are not fully defined: "There is not a need to vacate this alley at this time, as there is no proposed site plan," Cannella said, citing dumpster access and the need for 60 feet of unobstructed length for collection vehicles.
Council action and vote: Councilman Luis Viera read a substitute ordinance vacating, closing and abandoning the alley subject to recorded covenants. The roll call showed a majority in favor; Bill Carlson voted no and Councilwoman Naya Young was absent at the vote. The clerk recorded, "motion carried with Carlson voting no and Young being absent at vote." The ordinance includes the easements the applicants provided.
Why it matters: opponents warned that removing alley access could force refuse and service vehicles onto historic brick roadways (Bay and Magnolia streets), increasing wear and maintenance costs and degrading the neighborhood’s historic character. Supporters and the applicant argued the alley as vacated will be subject to recorded easements and that Solid Waste indicated no operational need for the alley as presented.
Next steps: the ordinance is adopted as read on second reading with the recorded covenants; residents and the council can review the recorded easements and any future site plans to confirm how service access and parking will be maintained.
