Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Superintendent Succession topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee clarifies superintendent succession language to cover absences and incapacitation

Racine Unified School District Governance Committee · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The governance committee recommended renaming 'emergency superintendent succession' to 'superintendent succession,' clarified designation order for acting executives, and agreed to keep the policy while refining interpretation language; staff will bring final language to the consent agenda.

The governance committee reviewed proposed revisions to OE2 — the district’s superintendent succession policy — and recommended changes to clarify expectations for short absences, planned acting appointments and for the rare event of superintendent incapacitation.

Staff proposed changing the title from "emergency superintendent succession" to simply "superintendent succession" so the policy covers both routine short absences (for example, planned conferences or vacations) and true emergencies. The proposal also clarifies that the superintendent will designate at least one executive staff member familiar with district governance and capable of assuming superintendent responsibilities during absences and that, in the event of incapacitation, the board would appoint a temporary or permanent replacement.

Why it matters: Committee members said clearer language will reduce confusion when the superintendent is temporarily absent and will define the order of designation (chiefs, executive directors, then directors) and the licensure expectation (preferably staff holding a superintendent license). Members discussed whether the district should be deemed noncompliant if, in a rare instance, no licensed staff are available — for example, when several leaders attend a conference at once — and concluded that the policy should remain but the interpretation should offer practical flexibility.

Committee directed staff to adjust OE2 language and interpretations to: separate absence vs. incapacitation clauses, require annual presentation of the list of designated staff, and add clearer communication expectations to the board and ASC leadership. The committee agreed to place the revised OE2 language on the consent agenda for the full board.

Next steps: Staff will edit OE2 and return the revised text and indicators for committee review and consent-agenda placement.