Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Progression topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District updates student‑progression policy to reflect new statute, adds PM3 summer retake
Summary
Deputy Superintendent Jamie Wyatt and Chief Academic Officer Maria Bishop presented revisions to Policy 8.01 to align with state law and district practices, including K–5 reading and K–4 math deficiency criteria, a summer retake option for the grade‑3 PM3 assessment, changes to Bright Futures volunteer‑hours, and updates to adult‑education GED protocols.
Deputy Superintendent Jamie Wyatt and Chief Academic Officer Maria Bishop presented proposed revisions to Policy 8.01 (promotion, placement and graduation plans) to reflect recent state statutory changes and updated district practices.
Bishop summarized changes across grade levels: updates to health and extended‑absence language; clearer guidance on hospital/homebound grading; counselor review for virtual instruction requests; expanded definitions and interventions for K–5 early literacy and K–4 mathematics deficiencies; and a middle‑school remediation model that specifies appropriate course placements.
At the elementary level, Bishop said state changes now require intervention for VPK students with a substantial literacy deficiency and that the revised policy adds parent‑notification language and a summer PM3 retake for third graders who did not meet the promotion standard. "It's to give students another opportunity to demonstrate proficiency," she said, and staff confirmed the retake affects promotion decisions only and not school accountability grades.
For high school, the revisions update course requirements, add the option to satisfy physical education or performing arts requirements via two‑year marching band participation, and modify Bright Futures volunteer‑hour thresholds for certain cohorts. Adult education revisions align co‑enrollment definitions and GED eligibility with state protocol changes; staff noted 16– and 17‑year‑old underage testing now goes through the state application process while the district continues to support testing logistics.
Board members asked for clarification on how parents can contest intensive reading placements and whether district data would be used to support placement decisions; staff noted statute governs placements and described district decision trees and new reading programs (Read 180) intended for intensive intervention.
No formal vote was taken at the workshop; the policy revisions will proceed through the district's policy development and adoption process.
