Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accountability Model topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Taylor leaders explain new state accountability model; 2025–26 set as baseline
Summary
District staff told the board the recently approved state accountability model will use 2025–26 as a baseline and add student-growth, career-readiness 'seals' and engagement measures to traditional test scores; staff said the changes create opportunities but raised measurement and workload concerns.
Taylor school staff detailed a new state accountability model that will use the 2025–26 school year as its baseline and expand how school letter grades are calculated.
A staff member identified in the meeting as Steve said the new model shifts the emphasis from test scores alone to a mix of "academic mastery" and student growth plus career-readiness indicators. "This year, the 25 26 school year will be our baseline year for this new model," Steve said.
Why it matters: Staff said the change was designed to capture individual student growth and real‑world skills that the previous test‑score–heavy method missed. Under the new rubric, academic mastery (iLearn, SAT/ACT components) will be a major factor but schools also earn points for growth, attendance and career/post‑secondary readiness "seals" that reflect credentials and work‑based learning.
How it will work: Staff described three checkpoint assessments during the year that they expect the state to use for growth measures. "We assume they're going to take it from these checkpoints that they have to take three times a year," a presenter said. The presenter also explained that a child who passes iLearn may start with a high point value (for example, 75) and can add points for attendance (94% threshold), passing additional coursework and earning seals. "So that is in my mind that's kind of a huge thing if they pull that data correctly," Steve said of the growth measure.
Grade bands and credits: Presenters walked the board through K–3, 4–8, 9–10 and 11–12 criteria. Middle‑school students can gain points by taking approved high‑school courses (computer science, PE) for credit, a change staff say will require schedule adjustments and shared teachers. Ninth‑grade measures emphasize being "on track" with credit accumulation; 11th‑ and 12th‑grade scores weigh seals, graduation rate and SAT results.
Work‑based learning and seals: The board discussed practical hurdles for employment seals: staff said an "honors plus" employment seal can demand substantial hours (one example discussed was 650 hours) and that employers must document that students learn skills beyond routine tasks. Staff suggested internal school placements and digital tracking tools (an app named Emblaze was mentioned) to record hours.
Concerns and next steps: Board members asked how growth will be calculated at the student level and flagged attendance and implementation workload as concerns. Staff reported ongoing spreadsheet and tracking work and said they will develop tools to estimate school scores under the new model. They also said the state will treat the first year as a baseline and that average thresholds will likely rise in subsequent years.
The board did not vote on policy changes at the meeting. Staff said they will return with tracking tools, further implementation plans and examples of how the new scoring would affect local schools.
