Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Window Replacement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Applicant withdraws request to install composite windows at 218 McCrae Street after commission asks for samples and evidence

Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission · May 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An applicant seeking to replace rear windows at 218 McCrae with Anderson composite windows withdrew the request after commissioners requested physical samples, evidence the existing windows were beyond repair, and clarification about condominium vs. townhouse responsibilities.

Historic Preservation staff brought forward a request May 14 to replace six rear windows at 218 McCrae Street with Anderson 100‑series composite (fiber) windows. The commission’s review focused on whether the existing windows are deteriorated to the point of necessitating replacement and whether the proposed composite material would be visually compatible with the district.

David King, the designated agent for the unit, told the commission that the rear wooden sashes were failing, many sashes were inoperable and there had been water penetration at the rear windows. King said the owners favored higher‑durability composite windows to reduce future maintenance; he also said front‑facing windows would be replaced with wood to preserve the historic view from the street.

Commissioners asked for a physical sample and closer photographic/evidentiary documentation of the existing windows’ conditions. They also sought clarity about whether the building is legally a condominium and which entity (individual owner or HOA) is responsible for exterior elements. King said he did not have a physical sample at the hearing and that contractors had recommended composite units for durability. After discussion, the applicant withdrew the request for composite windows and indicated they would consider wood‑for‑wood replacement or gather additional evidence and return at a later date.