Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs opening in‑district autistic support classroom after summer move‑ins
Summary
Two summer move‑ins requiring intensive autistic support prompted staff to propose creating an in‑district autistic support classroom; the board discussed Intermediate Unit (IU) outsourcing, staffing, costs and timelines and asked staff to produce detailed cost comparisons and advertise a teaching position immediately.
District special‑education staff told the board that two students who moved into the district this summer require intensive autistic support and verbal‑behavior interventions typically delivered in one‑to‑one or small‑group settings.
The presenter (identified in the transcript as Mrs M) said the students require interventions such as applied behavior analysis and verbal behavior programming and that state guidance caps certain itinerant programs at 12 but full‑time intensive autistic support classrooms are smaller. She said the students currently need one‑to‑one instruction and that existing life‑skills classrooms were not designed to deliver the same model of support.
Tony, an Intermediate Unit representative, told the board that the IU can provide technical assistance, coaching and consultation funded under IDEA (federal) funds "at no charge," but that direct in‑classroom services (teacher/paraprofessional staffing and transportation) are cost items the district must plan for. Business staff and board members discussed a CSU/ IU bundled quote (discussed during the meeting) and compared that to estimated in‑district startup costs. The transcript records that the district's special education funding line for the year is about $1,057,031, which staff said would increase next year if more high‑need students are enrolled.
Board members asked for rapid follow‑up because students are due to arrive and attend school this week. Suggestions included: (1) advertise and interview for a teacher immediately (staff said an anticipated position ad was being posted to speed hiring); (2) repurpose an existing paraprofessional into the autistic support classroom in the short term; and (3) obtain a clearer workforce/cost model comparing the IU bundle to standing up the classroom in‑house (including estimates for salary steps, benefits and potential transportation costs).
No formal decision was recorded. Staff said they would proceed to advertise an anticipated position and return to the board with detailed cost comparisons and a staffing plan.
Next steps: Business and special‑education staff will quantify in‑house startup costs and compare them with the IU's bundled quote, post/ad interviews for an anticipated teacher vacancy, and seek quick operational support from the IU while the district finalizes its plan.
