Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Navigator Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit faults Commerce's management of $92M Digital Navigator grants, finds weak oversight and documentation
Summary
SAO found the Department of Commerce failed to apply consistent grant-management practices in the Digital Navigator program, expanding grants without a competitive rebid, issuing $10.7M in reimbursements lacking documentation, and recommended strengthened rules, monitoring and training.
The State Auditor's Office told the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee that weaknesses in the Department of Commerce's grant and contract management undermined accountability in the Digital Navigator program that received roughly $92,000,000 between fiscal years 2022 and 2025.
SAO auditors said Commerce did not consistently use a competitive process when awarding or expanding grants, did not adequately vet grantees and subgrantees, issued contracts lacking essential deliverable and monitoring details, and failed to require consistent reporting formats. Auditors said these problems made it difficult to assess whether grantees met program goals and cited a FY2024 total of $10,700,000 in reimbursements that lacked sufficient documentation to verify allowability.
"This performance audit report serves as a case study in how neglecting the fundamental tenets of government accountability can sabotage even the most noble goals," Justin Stowe read from the auditor's written conclusion. The written report cited Commerce management of about $92,500,000 in public funds for the Digital Navigator program and described pervasive failures in oversight.
SAO described five essential grant-management components (clear competitive process, vetting, contract clarity, performance measures and defined reimbursement requirements) and concluded Commerce did not consistently implement them for the program. Auditors noted specific examples: the agency selected the first-, eighth- and eighteenth-ranked applicants in one round without documented explanation for later choices; several consortiums were later expanded in funding and scope without new competitive solicitations; and required reporting formats were not provided, producing inconsistent and often unusable data.
Commerce officials acknowledged the report and described reforms. Sarah Champion, chief contracts and compliance officer, said the agency has centralized contract management, established a new contracts and compliance division, issued an April 1 memorandum on contracting standards, and is developing risk assessments, monitoring plans and staff training. Mark Barclay, assistant director for the local government division, said Commerce will implement new procedures for contracts effective in July and collaborate with internal controls and compliance teams.
Committee members asked whether Commerce has pursued disciplinary actions, recapture of funds or can produce outcome metrics showing how many Washingtonians benefited. Commerce said it has performed a reconciliation, will pursue recapture if money is owed and can provide some program outcome data to the committee; an employment-related ethics referral was sent to the executive ethics board.
SAO recommended Commerce adopt and enforce grant-management procedures, set clear performance goals and reimbursement standards, improve documentation and train staff. Commerce told the committee it has begun those reforms under new leadership and will report progress.
