Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fort Pierce commission debates adding an evening "hard stop"; agrees to focus on agenda management
Summary
Commissioners debated whether to adopt an optional evening hard stop (for example an 11 p.m. cutoff) to avoid very late decisions. Views were split: some argued a set end time protects decision quality, others cited public and staff inconvenience. The commission asked staff to return with options and public feedback rather than adopt a hard stop immediately.
Commissioners spent an extended portion of the June 10 daytime meeting debating whether to adopt an optional evening "hard stop" to end deliberations at a set hour. Commissioner Broderick, who put the issue on the agenda, said a hard stop would keep commissioners fresh and improve decision making after long nights. "All of us here, with the exception of the mayor who has a full time job being mayor, work as well," Broderick said in favor, urging a limit on meetings that run into the late night.
Other commissioners warned a hard stop could unfairly penalize members of the public who traveled for evening agenda items and could burden staff. Commissioner Gaines said she would hate to force residents to return for a postponed item after sitting through hours of hearing. Commissioner Jay Johnson argued agenda management and more pre‑meeting work with staff might address the problem without a formal hard stop.
The commission discussed Port St. Lucie27s 11:00 p.m. practice (finish the current item and then vote whether to continue) as a model but did not commit to adopting the same approach. Instead, the body reached informal consensus to ask staff to explore options: better agenda sequencing (front‑loading items that draw public participation), a day meeting option for non‑quasi items, and public outreach to gauge opinion before any formal change.
No formal motion to adopt a hard stop was made; commissioners agreed to return the issue to staff with suggested options and public‑comment input for a future decision.
