Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Publications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board begins updating student publications policy after yearbook controversy; advisers and community want clearer guidance
Summary
The board held a first reading of revised publication and freedom‑of‑speech policies after community concern about yearbook content. Public speakers and board members urged a clearer definition of yearbooks, an administrative regulation with adviser guidance, and legal clarity around terms such as 'obscene' and 'libel.'
Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified opened discussion on Feb. 12 of updated language meant to govern student publications and adviser responsibilities, an item that attracted community attention after disputes over yearbook content in recent months.
At the meeting, speakers including Joan Davidson and Jeff Gold urged the board to add a clear definition of "yearbook" and to produce an administrative regulation that operationalizes the policy for advisers and student editors. "The policy needs to define what your yearbook is and what is not," Davidson said, urging specificity so that future editorial decisions are less ambiguous.
Board members and staff agreed to keep the Education Code as the legal baseline while drafting local administrative guidance. Members asked legal counsel to supply succinct definitions (for example, a workable legal definition of "obscene," "libel" and "slander") and to clarify whether the district can require rebuttal spaces for opinion pieces. Several board members proposed that the administrative regulation — not the policy text — be used for implementation detail, training and adviser professional development.
Why it matters: Education Code section 48907 sets the statutory limits on school‑sponsored student publications and the board said it will reference that law rather than reproducing its text verbatim in the policy. The community requested that the policy make clear distinctions among publications (yearbook, recurring newspaper, broadcast productions) because opportunities to respond and the permanence of publication differ across mediums.
Next steps: Staff will work with the task force of publication advisers and legal counsel to draft an administrative regulation that defines publication types, adviser roles and practical procedures — including whether editorial pages should carry a clear opportunity for rebuttal when the format allows. The policy will return for further consideration at a future board meeting.
