Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission hears overview of enforcement tools after cases of work begun without permits
Summary
Commissioners reviewed the city’s options for addressing construction begun without permits — elevated fees, stop‑work orders, administrative citations, liens and, in extreme cases, court action — and staff said enforcement is active, with roughly 110 active violation cases out of about 1,200 permits annually.
The Larkspur Planning Commission discussed enforcement options and penalties for building and planning work started without required city approvals during its Aug. 26 meeting.
Staff summarized available remedies: increased application and penalty fees, stop‑work orders, daily administrative citations intended to prompt applicants to obtain permits, and the ability to place liens or special assessments on properties when fines are unpaid. In extreme health‑and‑safety situations the city could seek court orders to compel remediation. Staff said the city generally tries to work with applicants to bring projects into compliance rather than immediately imposing citations.
Chief Building Official Bill Hansel described enforcement as an "active multi‑pronged process" that relies on permit tracking, code enforcement and field inspections. Staff said the city issues roughly 1,200 permits annually and currently has about 110 active enforcement cases that progressed beyond routine permitting. Recent high‑profile cases discussed included work at Three Heather Way and a site in Madrone Canyon that did not respond to citations.
Commissioners asked how penalties are set; staff pointed to the city’s fee schedule (adopted annually) and a sequence of notices required before formal code‑enforcement penalties are applied. Remedies used in practice include liens/special assessments that become due with property taxes, which staff said the city pursues when owners fail to pay fines.
Commissioners and staff agreed the enforcement system includes a range of tools, that staff is prioritizing proactive tracking through the permitting system, and that penalties and processes are sufficient but must be applied consistently to protect public safety and fairness among property owners.
What happens next: No formal policy changes were proposed; staff will continue enforcement actions and use existing remedies case‑by‑case.
