Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines major zoning code rewrite and Article 3 performance standards; timeline extends into 2026
Summary
City staff described a broad recodification of the zoning code focused on Article 3 (performance standards): utilities undergrounding, fences, accessory-structure limits, parking, EV charging, landscaping and enforcement tools. Staff said the rewrite identified hundreds of items needing corrections and aims for recodification in late 2026.
Get email alerts on the Code Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City of Victoria planning staff presented a sweeping update to Article 3 of the zoning code, describing changes to performance standards that will affect utilities, fences, accessory buildings, parking, landscaping and municipal enforcement.
"We identified over 500 items just within our zoning code that we need to take a look at for review," Associate Planner Travis Briley told commissioners, summarizing the scale of the review and framing why staff recommend a phased recodification. Staff said the recodification will modernize language, correct conflicts between zoning and municipal code, and reorganize district-specific standards.
Key proposals discussed included: an expectation that utilities be placed underground in new subdivisions when practical; clarified temporary construction-fence language; limits on accessory-structure footprints with a proposed 2,000-square-foot cap (staff agreed to evaluate proportional alternatives such as a percentage of principal structure); accessory setbacks that increase with structure height; screening requirements for HVAC units and exterior storage; single-driveway preference for single- and two-family lots; updated off-street parking definitions and EV-charging pedestal allowances; and a default requirement that disturbed land be restored with sod unless public works approves alternatives.
Commissioners debated specific thresholds and practical effects. For example, one commissioner asked whether a 20-foot minimum setback for air-conditioning equipment is workable on narrow lots; several commissioners suggested staff reconsider prescriptive rules that could add cost without clear community benefit. Staff marked multiple items for follow-up: revisit AC-unit placement and screening language, audit parking-space dimension assumptions, and investigate accessory-structure proportional limits used in peer communities.
On landscaping and tree preservation, staff noted the code already prohibits certain problematic species (for example, ash trees susceptible to emerald ash borer and elms prone to Dutch elm disease) and said they will coordinate with the DNR and the city's landscape architect on a recommended species list and tree-preservation measures.
Staff asked the commission to treat the session as the start of a multipart review; they plan to return with redlined drafts and more detailed language over the next several planning commission meetings and then proceed to public hearings and recodification steps aimed at late 2026.

