Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission asks staff for cost estimates on pursuing certified local government status for historic preservation
Summary
After a presentation by the Historical Commission, the board directed staff to return with cost estimates and alternatives for achieving better protection of historic resources, including the possibility of a certified local government designation and lower-cost regulatory options within current codes.
The Alachua County Historical Commission presented the board with its annual report and asked the county to consider pursuing certified local government (CLG) designation to strengthen preservation tools for county historic resources. Melanie Barr, chair of the Historical Commission, outlined ongoing work to identify historic cemeteries, research indigenous sites, and prepare state historical marker nominations.
Mike Castine, growth-management staff, explained the CLG process and requirements: adoption of a historic preservation ordinance, creation of a qualified historic-preservation review board, an updated historic-resource survey and staff capacity to administer CLG responsibilities. He said a survey-update alone could cost on the order of $100,000 and that CLG designation made the county eligible for modest competitive grants and technical assistance from the Florida Bureau of Historic Preservation.
Commissioners asked about alternatives that would achieve more protection without creating a large new program or adding substantial ongoing staffing costs. Several commissioners supported exploring options that use existing land-development regulations, shared staffing, or targeted programs. Commissioner Alford highlighted the county's bicentennial as a timely moment to consider preservation tools.
The board voted to instruct staff to return with more detailed cost estimates and options for: (1) pursuing CLG designation (including ordinance drafting, staffing needs and survey costs), and (2) alternatives that strengthen preservation protections through existing regulations and intergovernmental cooperation. The motion asked staff to include potential funding sources, whether grants could offset survey or startup costs, and whether any of the duties could be assigned to existing boards or shared with municipalities that already have preservation programs.
Melanie Barr emphasized that a CLG structure provides a regulatory review body with the authority to evaluate exterior changes to historic properties and to nominate resources to the National Register; she and other commission members said the CLG would also help communities navigate nominations and access small grant opportunities.
The board did not adopt a preservation ordinance or create a regulatory review board at this meeting; it asked staff to return with concrete options and cost/benefit analyses.
