Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council to keep exploring YMCA community pool financing; no city commitment tonight

Brainerd City Council · April 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council heard Baker Tilly'backed options for a proposed $4 million city‑financing package for a YMCA community pool and voted to continue working with the YMCA to refine terms, resident discounts and financing mechanics rather than make an immediate commitment.

Brainerd City Council heard a staff briefing and community presentation April 6 on plans for a proposed YMCA community pool and voted to continue exploratory discussions rather than approve city financing at this meeting.

Municipal advisor Chris Hogan of Baker Tilly told the council the city could issue tax‑exempt general obligation tax‑abatement bonds to fund a $4 million city contribution for the YMCA; preliminary interest assumptions presented to the council ranged from roughly 3.4% (10‑year) to 4.15% (20‑year) true interest cost in current markets. Hogan noted cost of issuance would be limited by applicable rules for 501(c)(3) conduit funding and estimated initial out‑of‑pocket issuance costs of roughly $18,000–$25,000.

YMCA CEO Shane Riffle described the project scope in schematic form: a six‑lane, 25‑yard lap pool, a warm therapy/zero‑depth pool, indoor court space for youth sports/pickleball and expanded child‑care and community programming areas. Riffle and supporters argued the facility would create community programming and economic activity near Sixth and Oak and provide reduced fees for Brainerd residents.

Council members raised several outstanding questions before any city commitment: how a resident discount would be defined and administered, whether the discount should be limited to city limits versus a broader service area, an amortization schedule showing levy impact, and whether a referendum or alternative financing path could be required to limit levy pressure. Multiple members asked the YMCA to provide a more detailed financing stack and clearer timeline for when private and grant funding commitments would be secured.

Council voted to continue working with the YMCA and staff to explore terms, financing options, resident discount mechanics and timelines for grant and private fundraising; the motion passed 5–2. Council requested a follow‑up that includes a detailed amortization schedule, explicit assumptions for resident discounts and estimated levy impacts for 10‑, 15‑ and 20‑year financing terms.

If the city later approves bond financing, staff and the YMCA would follow statutory steps for any tax‑abatement or GO bond issuance, including any required public hearings and a referendum period if applicable.