Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legal Allegation Restraining Order topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Former trustee says judge granted five‑year restraining order and accuses board of siding with alleged attacker

Hacienda la Puente Unified School District Board of Education · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Former trustee Christine Salazar told the board she obtained a five‑year civil restraining order after alleged harassment and said the board majority previously dismissed a protective order for political reasons; Salazar said she plans further legal action and linked the matter to district workplace‑safety obligations.

Former Hacienda La Puente Unified School District trustee Christine Salazar told the board on March 24 that a judge granted her a five‑year civil restraining order against Yang Wang and that the district previously failed to protect her during an earlier internal proceeding.

Salazar said the court found the harassment she described credible and that she "will be moving forward with legal action for this district's failure to meet its obligation for ... retaliatory conduct," adding that the judge’s order was "a direct rebuke of this board majority's decisions." She said the district adopted "politics" over safety when it dismissed a prior protective order, and she described continuing personal and family impacts.

The account prompted tense exchanges in public comment. Board members noted that some related matters had been handled in closed session, and district counsel reminded the meeting that litigation or confidential personnel matters discussed in closed session should not be disclosed. The board did not take any open‑session action related to the matter that evening.

Salazar’s statements referred to both civil and criminal processes; she told the board the district’s conduct exposed the district to potential legal liability under California workplace‑safety and retaliation rules. Board members said they were constrained by closed‑session confidentiality for litigation and personnel issues but that they take allegations of harassment seriously.

Ending: The allegations and Salazar’s account of the court order were aired during public comment. Because related legal and personnel matters were referenced, board members and counsel said parts of the subject require closed‑session review or legal follow‑up; members urged the public to await formal staff or legal responses.