Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning 40b topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning board finds Beach Plum Path deck replacement insubstantial for 40B unit
Summary
Owners of 18 Beach Plum Path received a finding that a proposed rear‑deck replacement and small side deck are an insubstantial change to an existing 40B comprehensive permit; the board asked the owners to supply a neighbor letter about fence encroachments in an easement.
The Town of Falmouth Zoning Board of Appeals found that proposed work at 18 Beach Plum Path — replacing a rear deck with a single‑story 16x10 addition and adding a small side deck — constitutes an insubstantial change to the site’s comprehensive (40B) permit and may proceed by right.
Owners Scott and Lauren (stated on the record) told the board the addition does not change the footprint beyond enclosing the existing deck area and the new space is intended for extra living area. The board examined plans and noted two fences shown on the drawings: a vinyl fence that appears to extend into an easement or common area and a stockade fence that may encroach on a neighbor’s lot.
The board concluded the proposed change does not meet the regulatory threshold for a "substantial change" under 760 CMR (examples of substantial changes include increases over 10% in height or number of units) and voted to treat the work as an insubstantial change to the comprehensive permit. Members asked the applicants to submit a short letter from the neighboring property owner(s) if available to clarify the fence situation for the file; the board noted easement encroachment questions are not strictly a zoning permit issue and may require separate resolution among property owners or other departments.
The board’s finding allows the owners to proceed without a new public hearing on the comprehensive permit, subject to town permitting requirements and any follow‑up needed to document fence encroachment concerns.
