Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Forest Park Ponds Vegetation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Forest Park pond vegetation-removal plan with matting, notification conditions
Summary
City Parks’ contractor proposed mechanical removal of cattails, phragmites and other vegetation from Forest Park ponds using an excavator-mounted hydro-rake; the commission closed the hearing and issued a standard order with special conditions requiring soil‑protection matting and advance notification before work.
Jackie Claiborne, assistant project manager with HBCA, presented a mechanical vegetation-removal plan to the Springfield Conservation Commission on behalf of the Springfield Parks Department. Claiborne said the work targets overgrown cattail, phragmites, arrowhead and other marsh plants in several Forest Park ponds and described the proposed method: an excavator with a perforated-bucket (hydro-rake) attachment will cut and extract vegetation at the water edge, allow the material to drain, then transfer it to trucks for transport to a dewatering/stockpile area (identified by staff as Prouty Grove). Claiborne emphasized there is no dredging proposed; each pond is treated as a separate project so per-pond removed volumes remain under permitting thresholds (one pond may be under 100 cubic yards even if the combined total could exceed 100 cubic yards).
Commissioners and staff raised concerns about access for heavy machinery on narrow park trails, the risk of soil compaction near stone walls and steep slopes, and how crews will operate during the park’s busy event season. Commissioners suggested matting to protect soils where equipment must cross sensitive areas and asked staff to require advance notification of workdays. Claiborne said Parks has the needed equipment and will coordinate schedules to minimize event impacts and take before-and-after photos.
Resident Colleen White spoke during public comment about persistent illegal lawn-waste dumping along a cove she monitors and urged the commission to pursue enforcement and community education. “I have a kayak. I’m going to start being a little more observant,” White said, offering to supply photos and locations to staff for follow-up. Staff noted the city can deploy movable cameras only on city land and asked White to provide addresses so enforcement staff can investigate.
After discussion, the commission closed the hearing and voted to issue a standard order of conditions with two additional special conditions: use of protective matting where equipment crosses or works adjacent to sensitive soils or walls, and a requirement for the Parks Department to notify the conservation office in advance of planned work days. The commission also agreed to seasonal bacteriological sampling for the Chicopee River (seven samples over the summer) and approved authorization for a professional survey related to an Abbey Brook conservation restriction (5.29 acres), which the prospective grantee required.
What happens next: Parks will coordinate with the conservation office on the special conditions, supply the required notifications, and proceed with phased vegetation removal; staff will undertake the agreed water-quality sampling and follow up on citizen-supplied evidence of illegal dumping.
