Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fort Pierce approves multiple annexations, adding parcels to city limits
Summary
On second reading the commission adopted several ordinances annexing multiple lots into Fort Pierce and directing county officials to update property appraiser/tax rolls effective Jan. 1, 2025; one annexation drew public questions about roads, sidewalks and distribution of tax revenue.
The Fort Pierce City Commission approved a series of second‑reading ordinances on Aug. 19 that extend the city’s territorial limits to include multiple parcels to be placed on the city tax rolls as of Jan. 1, 2025. The ordinances (including 24‑023, 24‑024, 24‑025, 24‑026, 24‑027, 24‑028, 24‑029 and 24‑033) direct the St. Lucie County property appraiser and tax collector to update assessments and taxes for identified lots and to file revised charter boundary information with the Department of State and the Office of Economic and Demographic Research.
Most second readings had no public speakers and passed on roll-call votes. Ordinance 24‑033 — an annexation near 3804 Sunrise Boulevard proposed for single‑family low‑density development — drew public comment from nearby residents concerned about road capacity, sidewalk availability and school impacts. Rhona Perry asked whether the city could provide police, sewer and roads for the annexed area; Jean Woodard asked where the additional city tax revenue would be spent and whether the funds would be earmarked for the affected neighborhoods.
City staff and commissioners said extra tax revenue from annexed property goes into the city general fund; several commissioners said they will continue coordination with St. Lucie County and the Transportation Planning Organization to address roads and sidewalks, and they noted the city regularly seeks grants and partnerships to fund infrastructure.
Each annexation ordinance included the usual severability, filing and effective‑date language and passed on second reading by recorded votes; the commission indicated these are routine boundary adjustments intended to bring identified lots into the city’s planning and tax base.
