Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fort Pierce advances 'innovative community development' code to encourage smaller, more affordable housing
Summary
Planning staff presented a package of code changes to allow accessory dwelling units, duplexes on constrained lots and a new 'innovative community development' process; commissioners and residents supported the goal of encouraging infill, but urged safeguards for infrastructure and neighborhood compatibility.
The Fort Pierce commission heard first readings and public comment on a set of linked land‑use ordinances aimed at easing development barriers on small lots and encouraging affordable housing. Planning Director Kevin Freeman described three interrelated code amendments: updates to general definitions (ordinance 24‑030), amendments to permitted uses to introduce an 'innovative community development' pathway (24‑031), and specific standards for those developments (24‑032).
Freeman said the changes align the zoning code with the comprehensive plan, clarify definitions for accessory dwelling units and agricultural uses, and create a conditional‑use pathway with clearer standards for site design, density, open space and compatibility. ‘‘We want to encourage a variety of housing sizes, types, and price points,’’ he said, explaining the amendments are intended to reduce project costs and open options such as duplexes, triplexes, tiny homes and accessory units in appropriate locations.
Public commenters included members of the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee and neighborhood residents. Keandria Davis, chair of the advisory committee, said the changes implement several recommendations to incentivize affordable housing. Jean Woodard and others urged the commission to ensure adequate roads, sidewalks and school capacity in areas subject to annexation and infill.
Commissioners asked staff to ensure the innovative community process includes enforceable conditions and remedies if applicants fail to meet approved terms; staff said conditional‑use violations can be referred to code enforcement and rescinded if terms are not met, and the new process will include explicit review criteria.
The ordinances received majority support in the planning board and the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee before coming to the commission; the items were approved on first reading with some modifications and will return for final adoption after public notice and any staff refinements.
