Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Setback Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BZA approves setback reductions for Tailwinds commercial subdivision despite wetland constraints
Summary
The board approved petition B‑106‑26 to reduce front and rear setbacks from 25 feet to 10 feet for an approximately 11‑acre commercial subdivision (Tailwinds) to enable 11,000‑sq‑ft spec buildings and roadway connectivity; staff cited economic benefits and wetlands constraints.
The Michigan City Board of Zoning Appeals voted May 12 to grant petition B‑106‑26, allowing reduced front and rear setbacks (requested 10 feet instead of the 25‑foot requirement) for a planned commercial subdivision near Cleveland Avenue.
Petitioners James Huss (DVG Team) and Matt Rossman (Integrated Construction Solutions) told the board the northern half of the parcel is the only developable area of a roughly 30‑acre tract, with wetlands and a stormwater detention area constraining the rest. Huss said the variance enables roughly 11,000‑square‑foot spec buildings and the road connectivity the city seeks; Rossman said the development will likely support contractor‑type businesses rather than retail.
Planning staff recommended approval, saying the 15‑foot reduction “will not be injurious to the public” and that the development will provide economic benefits, increased property values and additional consumers for nearby businesses. Staff and the attorney both referenced the variance standards in section 28.11(b) of the joint zoning ordinance.
Board members questioned emergency access, traffic capacity and the proposed building orientation; the petitioner said pavement behind existing commercial structures provides truck access and that two turn lanes on Cleveland Avenue were provided for exiting vehicles. Public commenters urged the board to seek community benefits (a bus stop location, a public‑art pedestal and coordination on tree and sidewalk standards) as conditions of approval.
The board approved the variance, with members discussing possible compromise language (a combined minimum building‑line requirement to preserve flexibility) and excluding dumpster corrals from the relief requested. The roll call recorded unanimous yes votes from those present.
Next steps: Final site plans will return to staff and the planning commission for individual lot approvals; the board’s approval applies to the subdivision-level setback relief as presented.
