Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lady Lake approves annexation and land‑use changes for 900 Kim Lane
Summary
On April 20, 2026, the Town of Lady Lake Commission unanimously adopted three ordinances to annex and reclassify a 0.19‑acre parcel at 900 Kim Lane owned by the Joanna M. Hall Trust, changing its future‑land‑use designation and zoning after Planning & Zoning and a prior first reading recommended approval.
The Town of Lady Lake Commission on April 20 adopted three related ordinances to bring a 0.19‑acre parcel at 900 Kim Lane into town limits and to change its future land use and zoning.
Planning staff told the commission the parcel, owned by the Joanna M. Hall Trust, is vacant, lies south of Kim Lane adjacent to a retention pond and formerly hosted a structure that will be replaced. Notices were mailed to 10 adjacent property owners; staff reported no correspondence in support or opposition and said the Planning & Zoning Board voted 4‑0 to recommend approval. The items also passed first reading April 6 by 4‑0.
"Staff does recommend approval of ordinance 20‑26‑02," planning staff said during the presentation. The ordinances included a voluntary annexation (Ordinance 20‑26‑02), a small‑scale future land‑use amendment (Ordinance 20‑26‑03) and a rezoning (Ordinance 20‑26‑04).
Under the proposals, the parcel's future land use would change from Lake County urban medium (which the staff said allows up to seven dwelling units per acre) to a Lady Lake designation described in staff materials as manufactured‑home high density (the presentation noted a proposed maximum of nine units per acre for that future‑land‑use category). The rezoning to the town's MXA (mixed residential medium density, MX‑8) was presented as a constraint on development that would limit the site to a maximum of eight dwelling units per acre, aligning the property with nearby incorporated parcels.
Commissioners moved, seconded and adopted each ordinance on second reading by unanimous roll call votes. Planning staff said setbacks and flood‑zone requirements would be enforced at permitting; the ordinances take effect upon publication "in accordance with law," as noted in the ordinance language.
The commission did not report any letters of public objection during the meeting, and staff reiterated the technical and planning boards had transmitted unanimous recommendations for approval.
