Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homeland Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts rule to consider Homeland Security funding after heated debate over ICE and agency reforms
Summary
The House on March 4 adopted a closed rule to take up H.R. 7744, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill, after a partisan floor fight over whether to tie funding for FEMA, TSA and the Coast Guard to funding and oversight of ICE and CBP. The rule passed after roll‑call votes; separate suspension votes passed several unrelated measures.
The House adopted a rule on March 4 that cleared the way to consider H.R. 7744, the fiscal‑year Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill, after a contentious floor debate over whether a single package should include funding and oversight changes for ICE and CBP alongside funding for FEMA, TSA and the Coast Guard.
The rule, offered under a closed process, provides one hour of debate, evenly divided between the committee chairs and ranking members, and waives points of order to allow the bill to be considered without intervening procedural hurdles. A recorded vote on the rule recorded the result as adopted (yeas 211, nays 209), after an earlier vote to order the previous question.
Supporters said the rule was necessary to restore full operations at DHS after a lapse in appropriations and to ensure the agencies that protect aviation, border security, cyber systems and disaster response have staffing and resources. “A yes vote on today’s rule is a vote to consider legislation that will fully fund the Department of Homeland Security, ensuring the agencies tasked with keeping the American people safe … are not weakened at a moment when threats are rapidly increasing,” a Republican floor manager said.
Opponents argued that Republicans were tying contentious ICE and CBP policies to funding for widely supported components of DHS and that the House should instead consider a narrower bill to fund FEMA, TSA and the Coast Guard immediately. Democrats repeatedly proposed separate text to fund components they described as “law‑abiding” while negotiating reforms for immigration enforcement; those amendments were rejected under the rule.
In addition to the rule vote, the House quickly completed several suspension calendar items. By voice and recorded votes, it approved a bipartisan bill to require timely processing of certain mortgage packages by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and passed other measures on the suspension calendar (notably S.723 passed under suspension 384–40; H.R.6472 passed under suspension 351–72).
What happens next: adoption of the rule allows H.R. 7744 to be debated under the terms set by the Rules Committee; members will next debate the bill and any amendments allowed under the rule. The House did not finalize the underlying DHS appropriations on March 4; members remained sharply divided over how to pair funding with oversight and enforcement provisions.
