Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wells boards forward and approve multiple land-use, street and parking ordinance changes; boundary-survey rule tabled
Summary
At a joint meeting, the planning board and selectboard moved forward a package of ordinance amendments including minor-subdivision definitions, private-street approval, Route 1 architectural standards, timber-harvesting compliance, parking changes to reflect LD 427, and a requirement that planning-board recommendations appear on town meeting warrants. The boundary-survey proposal was tabled for rewrite.
After the floodplain discussion, the planning board and selectboard worked through additional proposed amendments to the town code. The planning board voted to forward several items, and the selectboard then voted to approve and forward most of them by unanimous 5-0 votes.
Key items advanced or approved included minor-subdivision definition updates to align with LD 1829 and avoid drafting oversights; a private-street approval process to establish review and recorded plans so buyers understand maintenance responsibilities; amendments to Chapter 201 to modernize streets-and-sidewalks thresholds by dwelling-unit (not just lots); and updated timber-harvesting language taken from the state's model ordinance so local code complies with state forestry requirements.
An ordinance to apply architectural-design standards to certain residential buildings within 500 feet of parts of Route 1 was also forwarded after staff explained the intent to maintain corridor character. Boards discussed examples of nonconforming steel buildings in the corridor and emphasized preserving historic streetscape qualities.
The board debated changes to parking rules required by LD 427, which restricts parking requirements in designated growth areas to one space per dwelling unit and expands off-site parking allowances. Selectboard members raised concerns about summer rental parking demands in beach areas and suggested revisiting the comprehensive plan's growth-area mapping to reduce unintended impacts.
A proposed requirement to mandate boundary surveys and monumentation for new buildings or additions greater than 400 square feet within a specified distance of property lines drew the most technical pushback: members and staff discussed reducing the trigger distance to 5 feet, using existing iron rods where present, and keeping costs reasonable for homeowners. The board tabled that draft to rewrite the language.
The planning board moved, and the selectboard voted 5-0, to forward and approve the package of ordinance updates presented tonight, except for the boundary-survey item which was tabled for reworking and clearer thresholds. The boards adjourned after completing their votes.
