Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance And Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board invokes 'doctrine of necessity' to allow votes on superintendent matters; personnel and consent items approved with multiple recusals
Summary
On May 14 the Monroe Township Board read and passed a resolution invoking the doctrine of necessity to permit conflicted members to participate in votes related to Superintendent Dr. Chanley; the board then approved personnel and board action items by roll call with multiple recusals and excluded several checks from approval.
At the Monroe Township Board of Education meeting on May 14, board counsel read a resolution invoking the "doctrine of necessity" under the district policy and the School Ethics Act to allow board members who have conflicts of interest to participate and vote on matters related to Superintendent Dr. Chanley because the board lacked a quorum of non‑conflicted members.
The resolution, which the board read into the record, included a list of members with conflicts: Carmen Alvarez, Gail Depay, Peter Piro, Usha Chararma and Charles Zikner were listed as involved in litigation with Dr. Chanley; Kate Ratner was noted as having a spouse employed by the district. The resolution states it will be posted for 30 days and a copy provided to the school ethics commission.
Board counsel and President Mr. Weiss asked for a motion; following a brief discussion in which a member warned that unpaid legal bills could increase litigation costs, the motion to invoke the doctrine was moved, seconded and passed (with at least one member voting no). After invoking the doctrine, the board proceeded with the personnel and board action votes (personnel items A–Z and AA–AS, and board action items A–AB, AC), taking roll call votes. Multiple members recused themselves from specific letters and checks; the board approved the agenda items by consent roll call, except that checks numbered 15894–15898 were not approved.
The meeting record includes detailed recusal statements where members named individual letters or check numbers for which they had conflicts. The board president also congratulated award recipients and reminded attendees of upcoming events. The next regular meeting is scheduled for June 17.
